When it comes to young people – those Generation Zers – brands will do almost anything to court their interest and ultimately win them over. We’ve seen all sorts of desperate attempts by brands to capture the hearts and minds of today’s young people, many of which have backfired spectacularly. All too often brands consider the only way to a teenager’s heart is through the internet. But mistake.
Proctor and Gamble made one of the most ludicrous mistakes of the year when they made their own ill-fated attempt at connecting with the youth. P&G has tried to patent certain internet buzzwords, such as ‘LOL’ and ‘WTF’. The internet responded with a barrage of mockery, which has done more harm than good to P&G’s relationship with younger people. Brands need to be aware that courting youth approval can seriously backfire and when it does it is wholly detrimental to their reputations.
Internet users VS young people
For some mysterious reason, many brands have conflated ‘internet users’ and ‘young people’. It seems that there is an idea out there that the vast majority of those on the internet are millennials and younger and therefore to advertise products to them effectively, brands must harness the ‘culture of the internet’. For marketers, the culture of the internet is memes and text speak; hence we have seen an avalanche of meme-based ad campaigns. So many turn out to be cringe-worthy flops as the emphasis all too often is on the fact that the advert is a meme.
Brands impose their already existing ad campaigns onto a meme in the assumption that this is the preferred way for young people to digest online ads. This is just not the case. Memes of all types of work because they are funny. They don’t work because they are memes. This is a basic fact that seems to evade brands. The medium you use to promote your brand is useless if your message isn’t funny and smart. The same occurred with the use of emojis in marketing. Many brands saw this as a fast route to pleasing a younger audience and used them in their campaigns. They were, however, rarely relevant, intelligent or well placed and they fell flat.
Emojis, memes and text speak is never a substitute for relevant, humorous messaging.
Brands have got carried away
Arguably, brands have got carried away with this idea that they need to convey a human touch in all their ads. Yes, robotic and cold is never a right tone to incorporate into your campaigns, but using slang and jargon that you presume your customers use, in an attempt to fool them into believing that you are not a faceless, corporate entity, is never a right approach.
Yes, consumers are attracted to brands that have social value, i.e. a social consciousness and an affinity with particular causes, but to say that they feel emotional towards their favourite brand is a step too far when it comes to products like gardening tools and stain remover. The relentless attempts from brands to establish emotional connections with young consumers come across as patronising and desperate at times when consumers are all too aware that they are being communicated to by soulless corporate entities and no amount of fluffy emojis can disguise that.
Brands need to recognise that their messaging still has to be in keeping with their values. They can’t just paste massive emoji slogans on memes and hope to impress younger consumers. They need to stay authentic and trying to seem hard young is a sure way to ruin that. It may also be the case that in focusing too heavily on younger consumers, brands are failing to understand who their core market is. There are more than just millennials out there online.